<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Birth Activist &#187; Obstetricial Interventions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birthactivist.com/category/obstetricialinterventions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birthactivist.com</link>
	<description>bloggin&#039; for better births</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Stephanie B. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/12/activist-in-training-stephanie-b-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/12/activist-in-training-stephanie-b-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childbirth Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prenatal Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=2006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before taking the class “biopsych of childbirth” I had never heard about a woman being able to have an orgasmic birth. After watching the movie and much discussion about the topic, I find it sad that women will electively opt &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/12/activist-in-training-stephanie-b-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before taking the class “biopsych of childbirth” I had never heard about a woman being able to have an orgasmic birth. After watching the movie and much discussion about the topic, I find it sad that women will electively opt out of this potentially very rewarding (in more than one way) experience.</p>
<p>I think the problem lies in education. I feel like when a woman becomes pregnant and visits her OB GYN for the first time to confirm the pregnancy, it should be the OB’s responsibility to tell the woman about ALL of her options about giving birth; not just having about whether or not to have an epidural or a c-section. If women were to watch “Orgasmic Birth,” hospitals would lose a lot of money and this is probably the reason most OBs don’t want their patients to know about this side of birth. For the most part a skilled midwife and/or a doula and supporting friends and family is all that a woman really needs when giving birth. When a woman is brought into a hospital with all of the bright lights and commotion, it’s no wonder that labor becomes stalled. Stress and unfamiliar surroundings make it difficult for any real progression to take place. But, instead of sending the woman back home to labor, the doctor’s insist on jumpstarting the labor with Pitocin or other similar drugs. After the augmentation of labor comes a downward spiral of unnatural process that make it impossible for a woman to birth the way nature intended.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the fact that a woman’s body is not only able to successfully give birth (most of the time), but can provide the woman with such a rewarding cocktail of hormones after she has given birth is remarkable. This capacity in itself should be enough evidence to prove that outside interventions are not always needed and should be avoided if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/12/activist-in-training-stephanie-b-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Sarah J. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-mary-d-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-mary-d-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I switched into the Biopsychology of Birth class, I was resistant and uneasy talking about birth.  I didn’t even know my own birth story and I never thought to ask until this class.  I had always thought births were &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-mary-d-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I switched into the Biopsychology of Birth class, I was resistant and uneasy talking about birth.  I didn’t even know my own birth story and I never thought to ask until this class.  I had always thought births were done the same; the woman goes to the hospital and after hours and hours and numerous pain medications later, she was smiling with her baby.  Before this class, that’s all that mattered to me; the mother and baby are both healthy.  What I didn’t realize was all the unnecessary procedures that women were having done to them. </p>
<p>As a part of this class, we were assigned a hospital in the area to interview and find out their birth statistics. I had never thought of questioning the procedures being done because hospitals are a place that sick individuals go to, get treated, and feel better by the time they leave. These interventions are done to save individuals lives and are for the most part necessary. As I began researching the hospital, I found myself asking “Why are pregnant women, <span style="text-decoration: underline">who are not sick</span>, being treated the same way as people who have illnesses?” Doctors do not need to “save” women from their births, they should instead be supporting women and letting nature run its course.  This being said, I do understand that some women, and that percentage is a small one, need help in delivering a baby due to some complications. Many women however, have a body fit enough to deliver a healthy baby on their own and that right is being robbed away from them.</p>
<p>To further my research for this project, I decided to go on the hospital tour as a pregnant woman.  One of the first questions I had for the guide, who was also a nurse, was their c-section rate. With this, two women on the tour stated that they already had their c-sections planned and were so happy because they knew the definite day and time they would have their baby.  As I sat there stunned and feeling bad for these women, the rest of the group congratulated them and one woman was thinking of doing the same.  At this point I decided to ask about natural births and the tour guide stated that she sees plenty of vaginal births.  When I explained that I meant natural to be 100 percent intervention free, she looked at me like I was crazy. She said that when women first arrive they are hooked up to IV’s and fetal monitoring with an epidural not too far away.  My face must have said it all because she said that I didn’t understand how painful it was going to be and that many women need some kind of assistance. </p>
<p>After my tour, I was very upset and amazed at how much these women and the tour guide didn’t know. And I do not think that the women are to blame.  Doctors should be spending some time helping to educate about birth and all its wonders. Instead, they are ordering everything from fetal monitors and pitocin to epidurals and c-sections when all of these are usually unnecessary.  As I said before, a hospital is a place for the sick to become healthy and not the healthy to be treated as if they are sick and need saving. </p>
<p>This hospital experience has opened my eyes and made me realize that these hospital ways need to change. The only way that can happen is if women come together and fight against these unnecessary procedures that are being done to them before a completely natural birth is only a thing of the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-mary-d-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Carolyn C. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-carolyn-c-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-carolyn-c-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the end of the semester approaches in my Bio Psych of Birth course, the question “What does normal birth mean to you?” arose.  As I pondered what normal birth meant to me, I couldn’t help but wonder what others &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-carolyn-c-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the end of the semester approaches in my Bio Psych of Birth course, the question “What does normal birth mean to you?” arose.  As I pondered what normal birth meant to me, I couldn’t help but wonder what others who were not exposed to my class thought of the question.</p>
<p>While conversing with a nurse during my shift on a maternity floor, I proposed the question of what&#8221; normal birth”  is to her. The nurse replied, “ It is a woman who comes into the hospital with no complications and gives birth vaginally to a healthy baby.” The point she was trying to make is that when a birth occurs within a hospital it is considered a normal birth. I pushed further and asked would a normal birth include interventions. She replied, “Yes, if a little aid is needed for comfort, she will be provided with the necessary intervention.” The nurse’s definition changed from a delivery within a hospital vaginally to using any medical means necessary for a vaginal birth with no complications for the mother and child.</p>
<p>I decided to look for another opinion of a normal birth from a fellow nursing student who has not been exposed to the lectures of the bio psych of birth class. The student stated a normal birth consisted of “&#8230;giving birth in a hospital with medication to control the pain, and if it takes too long a c-section.” I am somewhat ashamed to admit that this was almost my own verbatim definition prior to my exposure to the Bio Psych of Birth class.</p>
<p>The nurse and my fellow classmate described what is known as the norm within the United States. Contrary to popular belief, the norm is different from &#8220;normal birth.&#8221; A norm is what the trend, or what the majority of the population does. In 2009, 32.7% cesarean sections, 55.5% epidurals, 20.1% medical inductions, and 24.6% augmented labors occurred statewide in New York. These percentages are viewed as ‘the norm’ within the United States. The true definition of a normal birth is the woman’s ability to trust her own body to perform the birth process with no unnessary interventions.  A normal birth consists of a woman in the company of a support system relishing in the experience and excitement of childbirth on their own.</p>
<p>Today I would like to pose a question to <em>you</em>: why is it that normal, non-interventive birth, which has been achieved for centuries by women everywhere, is now considered abnormal within today’s society?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-carolyn-c-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Jacquelyn C. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-jacquelyn-c-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-jacquelyn-c-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever played the game, Brick Breaker?  The point of the game is to use your pod at the bottom of the screen to catch and bounce a ball back and forth to the top of the screen to &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-jacquelyn-c-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever played the game, Brick Breaker?  The point of the game is to use your pod at the bottom of the screen to catch and bounce a ball back and forth to the top of the screen to break bricks.  But as you break the bricks little icons fall down your screen and you have to avoid them because their sole purpose is to make the game more difficult for you.</p>
<p>While taking everything that is going on into consideration, you also have to keep your eye on the time, because as time passes, all of the bricks begin to creep slowly down the screen toward your pod.  Once those bricks touch your pod, the game is over.  You either have to know what you are doing or you are most certainly going to lose.  And sadly, even when you think you know what you are doing the game might toss you a curve ball and you could still lose.  This game reminds me an awful lot of laboring women in hospitals.</p>
<p> A woman laboring in a hospital is very similar to the pod you are trying to protect in Brick Breaker.  Getting through her contractions is like breaking those bricks.  Finally, giving birth to her baby is the equivalent to eliminating all of the bricks! However, before that can happen, the hospital, much like Brick Breaker, is going to make that a difficult venture.  They will offer her Pitocin, to speed up her labor.</p>
<p>Then they will offer her an epidural to ease the pain that accompanies Pitocin; but an epidural slows down labor.  She better keep her eye on the time, because the longer she takes, the closer a cesarean section comes to her precious pod, ultimately keeping her from winning the game.  What I would call winning, in this situation, is the woman being able to deliver vaginally and without medication or intervention – inherently, how she intended. </p>
<p>If women have a choice, why would they choose to play this sort of ‘game’? If a woman wants to have a natural, un-intervened, vaginal birth she should be able to do it.  It is her game; she should be able to make her own rules. After all, birth should not be about avoiding impending doom, it should be about happily bringing a child into the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-jacquelyn-c-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in trainging: Zakiyah W. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-trainging-zakiyah-w-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-trainging-zakiyah-w-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at the rooms…. don’t ask for the stats!! As part of our biopsychology of birth class, we were put into groups and sent out to different hospitals to collect information. Some of the information we received included &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-trainging-zakiyah-w-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Take a look at the rooms…. don’t ask for the stats!!</strong></p>
<p>As part of our biopsychology of birth class, we were put into groups and sent out to different hospitals to collect information. Some of the information we received included Cesarean section rates, rates of intervention as well as standard practices in these facilities. We were disturbed with most of the information we found as well as the level of difficulty in collecting it.</p>
<p>The class went to hospitals and birth centers all over the Hudson Valley from St. Luke’s Hospital in Newburgh to Vassar Brothers Medical Center in Poughkeepsie. I was actually assigned to the Neugarten Family Birth Center in Rhinebeck and after hearing about all of the different hospitals I must say that this is THE place to give birth in the Hudson Valley.</p>
<p>            After visiting the birth center at Northern Dutchess Hospital I was blown away by how understanding they were to the birth process, seeing it as a beautiful experience in which the mother knows her body and being confident that she can deliver her baby without the use of interventions. Then we flip to other hospitals in the Hudson Valley where there is no faith in their patients. Women are confined to their beds and not allowed to move during labor, pain medication is thrown at every patient, inductions happen in most cases.</p>
<p>            When hearing about all of the services that the Neugarten birth center provides I was thrilled to know that there was somewhere that women could go and have a birth that wasn’t restricted by impatient hospital staff and these ridiculous ideas of “standard of care”. But it also highlighted how many problems there are in the United States system regarding birth. Being able to move freely during labor or eating when hungry isn’t something that I should be excited about. Women should not be worried about being overwhelmed by an enormous amount of interventions being thrown at them as soon as they walk into the hospital doors. Reforms are being made in the field of healthcare but what is being done about the problems with our birthing system???</p>
<p>            This class has truly opened my eyes to all of the issues that need to be addressed in the birth system in America. From the use of interventions to the rate of Cesarean sections, something needs to be changed. The first step is to make people aware of the problems and with this awareness comes change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-trainging-zakiyah-w-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acitivist in Training: Marisa P. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/acitivist-in-training-marisa-p-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/acitivist-in-training-marisa-p-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cesarean Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our society today, it seems that obstetricians keep narrowing their definition of normal. They seem to jump at any opportunity they can to intervene with the normal process of birth. And with the standard use of electronic fetal monitoring &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/acitivist-in-training-marisa-p-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our society today, it seems that obstetricians keep narrowing their definition of normal. They seem to jump at any opportunity they can to intervene with the normal process of birth. And with the standard use of electronic fetal monitoring in hospitals, they find it easier and easier to send the woman for an “emergency” c-section. It really makes no sense to me; I feel like the current OB’s have no belief in the female body. I mean, our bodies are designed to reproduce and to carry and birth babies, and over time we have lost faith in the human body and what it is capable of. Our society keeps trying to find ways to make birth easier and faster, and by doing so, more expensive as well. Honestly though, how do these OB’s think they were born, how do they think generations before them were born? Women have been carrying and delivering babies for thousands of years-is it really necessary to change something that wasn’t going wrong in the first place? I don’t think so.</p>
<p>                My sister-in-law ended up having a cesarean, due to high blood pressure towards the end of her pregnancy. My nephew’s birth weight was 9lbs 6 oz. After the delivery when her OB came to see her the next day she said to my sister-in-law “There is no way you would have been able to push that baby out.” This is just so irritating to me. Doctors have no confidence in women and their bodies, and if they make statements like the one said to my sister-in-law, they are making women feel like they are not capable. They are taking away their confidence of themselves and their bodies. And for the most part the woman will believe their doctor, because they’re the doctor, not you.</p>
<p><em>                </em>As a nursing student, I have seen two c-sections. The first one I saw, I had to walk out before the baby was “born” because I the smell of the skin being cauterized made me feel so sick to my stomach and like I was going to pass out.  The second one I saw I was able to stay in the OR the whole time. I could not believe how barbaric the procedure was. Cutting, cauterizing, pulling, shoving, it was really hard to watch. As the doctor prepares to reach in and grab the baby, he has the nurse or assistant use what looks like a big shoe horn to hold/pull back on the incision to make as much room as possible for the doctor to get inside and remove the baby.  No wonder the woman is in so much pain afterwards, they push and pull and shove her insides around and deliver a baby that apparently was in distress (which is, most of the time, actually healthy at birth). If doctors weren’t so busy looking at the printouts of the electronic fetal monitor there would not be so many c-sections. They see a few decelerations and get all panicky, well what do you think that baby has been doing in there for 40 weeks? It probably has decelerations every day of gestation, only now that it is visible on monitor the doctors can use it to back up their advice that the woman should have a cesarean.</p>
<p>                With my own experiences and in reading both Cassidy’s <em>Birth</em> and Goers <em>A Thinking Woman’s Guide to a Better Birth</em>, I don’t know how a woman could want or be okay with having an (unnessary) cesarean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/acitivist-in-training-marisa-p-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Kyle M. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-kyle-m-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-kyle-m-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cesarean Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postpartum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cesarean section, like many modern medical procedures, has an important purpose that when used appropriately can save the life of a mother or that of her baby or both. That being said, there is no medical reason for a &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-kyle-m-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cesarean section, like many modern medical procedures, has an important purpose that when used appropriately can save the life of a mother or that of her baby or both. That being said, there is no medical reason for a healthy first time mother to give birth via cesarean, or that it is necessary to mandate a woman with no underlying health risks to have a section because she has had one before. In fact, it may be more dangerous for a woman to have repeated C-sections instead of vaginal births after a cesarean (VBACs). </p>
<p>The cesarean section is a form of major surgery and like any other, it (usually) includes anesthesia and a warning of any associated risks (any potential complications during or after). While the medical community may provide people with information about the procedure and inform a woman about her options, a lot in the decision making will be affected by what an attendant thinks is necessary to keep a baby safe. These decisions are made based on factors like breach births or fetal distress, which may be, but are not always be an indication of alarm or an end-all for a vaginal delivery. I am not saying that high risk patients or emergency cesarean sections are unnecessary, but that the criteria for deciding on having a section are broadening and causing an increase in cesarean rates that should be cause for concern.</p>
<p>  I believe that this increase is due in part to the belief that cesarean sections are a quicker and safer alternative than natural birth. What I believe to be underemphasized by the medical community when educating patients, is the impact a C-section can have on the birth experience and the toll it may take on a woman and her family during recovery. Typically, a woman who undergoes the procedure of a cesarean section have their arms strapped down as a safety precaution, their face shielded from the sight of the surgery, and are medicated to block the pain of the incisions, extraction and stitching. After a baby is taken out of their uterus, it may be hours before the mother gets to hold or feed her baby for the first time. Even after leaving the hospital a mother will feel discomfort, she is not permitted to move around very much, and is given a weight limit for things she can pick up or carry. And lastly, despite the recent innovation of the “bikini-cut,” physical and/or emotional scars are something that may stay with them forever.</p>
<p>Lesser reasons for this increase in frequency of cesareans may be the result of fear of pain and trauma with a vaginal delivery or the notion that vaginal delivery is antiquated.  Although doctors do not always readily accept requests for cesareans from healthy pregnant women, it does still happen. I believe the most important take-away message from all of this is that vaginal delivery is a safe and natural experience for women who are not truly high-risk. Cesarean sections play an important role in helping those who are high-risk, but a completely unnecessary and potentially dangerous role for those who aren’t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-kyle-m-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Marie R. (post #2)</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-marie-r-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-marie-r-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 02:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tour Group that Never Spoke                 Almost about two weeks ago today I took part in a tour of the mother/baby and Labor &#38; Delivery rooms at Vassar hospital. As part of the total grade for a Birth class &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-marie-r-post-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center">The Tour Group that Never Spoke</p>
<p>                Almost about two weeks ago today I took part in a tour of the mother/baby and Labor &amp; Delivery rooms at Vassar hospital. As part of the total grade for a Birth class that I am attending one requirement was to get “informed” of statistics and birth cultures at local hospitals. I took the liberty of telling the hospital that I was pregnant (3 months) and wanted to view the hospital as a possible birth site, and my findings were infuriating to say the least!</p>
<p>                When I arrived at the hospital I met the other women and men who were taking the tour in the lobby. Our group was greeted by the tour guide whose first statement to the group went something like this: “I am here this morning to show you around the labor and delivery birthing center, and to answer any questions that you may have, but I am not a medical professional so I cannot answer any medical questions you may have”. That definitely set the tone for how this tour was going to proceed. As we moved through the tour the guide had pointed out the “lovely photographs on the walls” and “the great view of the Hudson river&#8221; that you get to enjoy when you deliver at the hospital. She also added in that the phone is completely free for the mother’s first night after having the baby and that if you have your baby on a Sunday you and your husband can watch football for free as well.</p>
<p>                Besides feeling like this tour guide was trying to sell me the hospital rather than a positive birth experience I also noticed something else that felt off to me: not one person on the tour asked a single question. I had many questions and going into the facility as a &#8220;pregnant woman&#8221; who was interested in delivering in their hospital I demanded some answers. At first the tour guide tried to answer some of the questions, for example I asked what percentage of people within the last year who labor there had received some type of augmentation of labor. The women seemed quiet confused and said that she would introduce me to someone better equipped to answer my questions.</p>
<p>                I was then introduced to the head nurse for labor and delivery, who at first was very warm and inviting of my questions, though she soon became defensive and hesitant in answering them. The answers that she gave me as a “consumer” of the “product of birth” were astonishingly different than those listed on their state mandated report of statistics. One example: I had asked the woman what percentage of women receive an unplanned epidural when then come in with a birth plan specifically stating that they do not want one. Her answer to this was “unfortunately around 20%-30% of then NEED it”, after researching public records actually statistic the actual statistic was closer to 60%!</p>
<p>                I do not mean to speak badly about this hospital or any other, I just wanted the truth, and this is what I got. It makes me angry to think that one of the women who holds a specialist position in the labor and delivery room did not answer my questions correctly. It infuriates me to think that she may have lied and makes me very disappointed to think she just may not have known!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/11/activist-in-training-marie-r-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Stephanie B.</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-stephanie-b/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-stephanie-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cesarean Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VBAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In class on Tuesday we had the pleasure of speaking with Dr. B who is an OB/GYN in California. I have to admit that at first I expected her to have the same views of labor and birth as the typical &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-stephanie-b/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In class on Tuesday we had the pleasure of speaking with Dr. B who is an OB/GYN in California. I have to admit that at first I expected her to have the same views of labor and birth as the typical obstetrician, however I was pleasantly surprised. Her views about interventions during labor were the least interventions the better, which is the opposite of what most OBs would recommend. It was very refreshing knowing that there are obstetricians out there who are trying to change the way the field operates. She admitted that she’s faced much opposition from her hospital especially when it comes to performing VBACs. Sometimes she would even transfer a woman to a different hospital so she could have a VBAC instead of performing a cesarean on her. Dr. B is herself pregnant at the moment and is facing a struggle because she has had a cesarean and would prefer to VBAC, but she’s not sure if she will be able to do so.  I find it almost ridiculous that a doctor even has trouble taking control over her birth. I mean, don’t you think she would know better than anyone what’s appropriate for her body?</p>
<p>I think it’s exciting to be living during a time of such change; not only when it comes to birthing techniques, but everything else that’s going on in the US.  It’s times like these where the industry is facing such opposition that real change will take place. It may take several years, but I do see radical changes in our future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-stephanie-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist in Training: Mary D.</title>
		<link>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-mary-d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-mary-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Homebirth Babe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Induction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obstetricial Interventions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birthactivist.com/?p=1869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week in our Biopsychology of Birth class, we discussed the tools used in labor and some of the birth fads that have come and gone (or stuck around).  One of the topics we discussed was induction of labor.  We &#8230; <a href="http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-mary-d/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week in our Biopsychology of Birth class, we discussed the tools used in labor and some of the birth fads that have come and gone (or stuck around).  One of the topics we discussed was induction of labor.  We have discussed the issue multiple times since the class began and the more I learn about it, the more the idea frustrates me.  Women are induced for various different reasons; unfortunately, these reasons are not always medically necessary. </p>
<p>Convenient induction is one something that just seems unnatural to me.  Choosing to be induced just because you are tired of being pregnant, cannot wait any longer to meet your baby, or simply because labor would fit best in your schedule that week should not, in my opinion, be reasons to have an induction, but in our culture many timesthis kind of reasoning results in an induction. I have never been pregnant so I cannot say that I if I  was I would not be tempted with the idea of induction at the end of my pregnancy, if that means being able to meet my baby sooner, but I truly hope that I would be able to wait and allow the baby to come on its own time. Giving birth is a natural process and therefore we should remember that babies will almost always come when they are good and ready.</p>
<p>We need to move away from this idea that if the baby doesn’t arrive on its predetermined due date than it’s late and must need some assistance entering the world.  On the first day of our Biopsych of Birth class, we all shared the stories of our own birth and not a single one of us was born on our “due date.”  I have now come to realize that due dates are more vague suggestions than hardcore fact.</p>
<p>There are cases where babies are in trouble and need medical induction in order to get out safely.  However, I think too many women are quick to assume that if the baby is a few days late then they must be in danger, when they really may just have a late bloomer on their hands.  I support taking the right precautions and getting late term ultrasounds to ensure the baby is in good health but if they check out that everything is fine &#8211;  the only thing left to do is wait.  Nobody likes to feel that they are being rushed and forced into a situation; your new baby is not any different.  It is like the old saying goes “Good things come to those who wait.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.birthactivist.com/2010/10/activist-in-training-mary-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

