CDC Releases Home Birth Data

Today the Center for Disease Control and Prevention released some much anticipated data regarding home birth from 1990 to 2006.

Inside the released data, it showed an increasing trend in out of hospital births.  Home births rose about 5% from 1990 to 2005 and were steady in 2006.  About two thirds of these births were at homes and about another third were in birth centers. Which I believe has come from more education on the safety of home birth, as well as the increased interest in women who do not wish to be put through the hospital birthing system, or are looking to VBAC in an area with no hospitals currently permitting the hot button procedure.

What this study also showed was an increase in Midwife attended home birth, showing that women are planning these births and not just accidentally birthing at home, or not making it to the hospital in time. The number of midwife attended home births increased from 43% in 1990 to 61%.

What Robin pointed out on Pregnancy.about.com is that people will try and blame or say these trends are due to the popularity of the film The Business of Being Born, or the Big Push for Midwives campaign but these were unavailable during this time. The Business of Being Born was not released until 2007.

I find these statistics encouraging because women are becoming more educated on their options, and truly are being informed consumers.

_{MacDorman M, Menacker F, Declercq E. Trends and characteristics of home and other out-of-hospital births in the United States, 1990-2006. National vital statistics reports; vol 58 no 11. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2010.}

CDC Releases New Report Comparing U.S. and European Infant Mortality Rates

The CDC National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) released a new report this morning which compares infant mortality rates in the U.S. and Europe.

Authors of Behind International Rankings of Infant Mortality: How the United States Compares with Europe explored what they refer to as the recent stagnation in the U.S. infant mortality rate that has generated widespread concern among researchers, policy makers, health care providers and activists.

Using data from the United States? Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set and the European Perinatal Health Report, authors Marian F. MacDorman, Ph.D., and T.J. Mathews, M.S. of the CDC National Center for Health Statistics found that the main cause of the United States high infant mortality rate when compared with Europe is the ?very high percentage of preterm births in the United States.?

According to the study, while infant mortality rates for preterm (less than 37 weeks of gestation) infants are lower in the United States than in most European countries, infant mortality rates for infants born at 37 weeks of gestation or more are higher in the United States than in most European countries.

Discussions of the U.S. infant mortality rate are often countered with criticism that the U.S. records data differently than other countries, reporting very premature babies as live births. While this is true for five of the 19 European countries whose data was analyzed, 14 of the 19 European countries require that all live births at any birth weight or gestational age be reported.

The United States remains near the bottom of the rankings.

The report states, ?Reporting differences have little effect on the percentage of preterm births because most preterm births occur well after 22 weeks of gestation. For example, the percentage of preterm births for the United States in 2004 was 12.5% when all births were included and 12.4% when births of less than 22 weeks of gestation were excluded.?

MacDorman and Mathews attribute much of the high infant mortality rate in the United States to the high percentage of preterm births. Using the direct standardization method to apply the U.S. gestational-age specific infant mortality rates to Sweden?s distribution of births by gestational age, the NCHS found evidence that lowering the percentage of preterm births could have a dramatic impact on infant mortality in the United States.

November is also Prematurity Awareness Month.? Considering the risks involved in preterm birth, you may be wondering what you can do as a birth activist or as a parent.? Here are some basic things to consider:

• Let labor begin on its own. Without a valid medical reason, let your baby pick his or her birthday for the safest, easiest birth.
• Choose a practitioner with a low induction rate. If you have a midwife or doctor who rarely sees anyone who goes past their due date, it should be a red flag.? Ask the receptionist for her opinion of how many women go past 40 weeks. The answer might surprise you.
• Know the signs of preterm labor. If you think you’re having any of the signs of preterm labor, call your midwife or doctor immediately.? The sooner you get help, the more likely that premature birth can be delayed or stopped completely.
• Be mindful of the risk factors. Face it, you have responsibility for some of the risk factors.? While there are certainly some risk factors for preterm labor that you don’t control, take charge of the ones you can, including prenatal care, good nutrition, not smoking, etc.